|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{a|isda|}}“{{isdaprov|Innocent Party}}” isn’t a sanctioned ISDA definition, but it should be. It is the [[JC]]’s cheeky shorthand for “a {{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}} or a {{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}}, [[as the case may be]]”. We suggest, weakly, that “a {{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}} or {{isdaprov|Affected Party}}, [[as the case may be]]”, might be an “{{isdaprov|Implicated Party}}”. But no one will listen, so this remains expanded ISDA universe [[fan fiction]]. | | {{nman|isda|2002|Innocent Party and Implicated Party}} |
| {{sa}}
| |
| *{{isdaprov|Defaulting Party and Affected Party}}
| |