Legal process outsourcer: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|design|}}{{quote|
{{a|people|}}{{quote|
Looks traveled. Hey—it’s lunchtime—let’s cook by electric chair.
Looks traveled. Hey—it’s lunchtime—let’s cook by electric chair.


Line 6: Line 6:
They packed them in. They stuffed the hoods. They pulled the switches. Sparks popped. The meat fried. The hoods dripped fat.
They packed them in. They stuffed the hoods. They pulled the switches. Sparks popped. The meat fried. The hoods dripped fat.


The meat cooked uneven. The concept rocked. The reality stunk.}}
The meat cooked uneven. The concept rocked. The reality stunk.
:—James Ellroy, {{br|The Cold Six Thousand}}}}


A firm that collects the windfalls and low—hanging fruit of contract negotiation by engaging cheap, paralegal staff, often in remote jurisdictions, to crunch through low-value legal processes no one else can be bothered to do doing properly.
A firm that collects the windfalls and low—hanging fruit of contract negotiation by engaging cheap, paralegal staff, often in remote jurisdictions, to crunch through low-value legal processes no one else can be bothered to do doing properly.
Line 15: Line 16:


The LPO business model is easy to articulate in a four-box diagram, but hard to execute in practice. Hence there are very few of them out there, and they haven’t really made inroads on mainstream legal practice.
The LPO business model is easy to articulate in a four-box diagram, but hard to execute in practice. Hence there are very few of them out there, and they haven’t really made inroads on mainstream legal practice.
{{sa}}
*[[Law firm]]
*[[Thought leader]]