Lucy Letby: those experts in full: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{A|letby|{{small|60}}{{Letby dramatis personae}}{{letby colleagues}}</div>}}{{drop|A|s some kind}} of public service I am running a list of experts who have made public statements about Lucy Letby’s case since {{new yorker article}}. This includes experts used in the trial, neonatologist, paediatricians, endocrinologists, toxicologists, statisticians {{strike|,|and}} lawyers {{strike|and accredited journalists|}} who have made public statements about the case either in the course of the trial or since.
{{A|letby|{{small|60}}{{Letby dramatis personae}}{{letby colleagues}}</div>}}{{drop|A|s some kind}} of public service I am running a list of experts who have made public statements about Lucy Letby’s case since {{new yorker article}}. This includes experts used in the trial, neonatologist, paediatricians, endocrinologists, toxicologists, statisticians and lawyers who have made public statements about the case either in the course of the trial or since.


I will footnote those interventions as time allows.
====New additions!====
====New additions!====
I have added the new insulin experts whose reports have been submitted to the Criminal Cases Review Commission and created a new list for Ms Letby’s former colleagues at the Countess of Chester Hospital who responded to Rule 9 statement requests from the Thirlwall Inquiry for a written statement. I have excluded the one statement that was made anonymously (the point of this exercise being to identify people who are prepared to go on the record), though for the record, it also reflected “no concerns”.
I have added the new insulin experts whose reports have been submitted to the Criminal Cases Review Commission and created a new list for Ms Letby’s former colleagues at the Countess of Chester Hospital who responded to Rule 9 statement requests from the Thirlwall Inquiry for a written statement. I have excluded the one statement that was made anonymously (the point of this exercise being to identify people who are prepared to go on the record), though for the record, it also reflected “no concerns”.
I have now moved all the COCH employees, including those who gave evidence in the trials, to the “ex-colleagues” table. Where they gave evidence to the Thirlwall Enquiry, I have hyperlinked to their statement or transcript. Otherwise I have hyperlinked to the interview/article in which their view is covered.


====Get in touch====
====Get in touch====