83,307
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Oh ''really''? | Oh ''really''? | ||
This convenient view — I mean, you would say that, wouldn’t you? — prompts more questions that it answers: if the [[agent]] isn’t responsible for unallocated trades, then | This convenient view — I mean, you ''would'' say that, wouldn’t you? — prompts more questions that it answers: if the [[agent]] isn’t responsible for unallocated trades, then, until they’re allocated,''who'' is? The [[broker]] doesn’t know who the [[principal]] is, so it can hardly take up matters with it directly. On the other hand, [[asset manager]]s will hotly deny any kind of personal liability, appealing to their regulatory status, meagre capitalisation, or sheer importance as a valued client in intimating that this risk ought to be the [[broker]]'s problem. | ||
So much bunk — all of these reasons. The [[manager]] is the agent chose not to disclose its [[principal]]. By doing so it accepted unconditional responsibility for settling its client’s transaction. | So much bunk — all of these reasons. The [[manager]] is the agent chose not to disclose its [[principal]]. By doing so it accepted unconditional responsibility for settling its client’s transaction. |