Air crashes v financial crashes: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|systems|{Erebus|gif|}}}}[[Nassim Nicholas Taleb]] famously laments the failure of financial services industry to learn from its errors. He contrasts it with the airline industry which has systemically improved safety after every air crash since the 1960s, such that the number of casualties per million miles travelled has dropped from 90 to a ''fraction''.
{{a|systems|{{image|Erebus|gif|}}}}[[Nassim Nicholas Taleb]] famously laments the failure of financial services industry to learn from its errors. He contrasts it with the airline industry which has systemically improved safety after every air crash since the 1960s, such that the number of casualties per million miles travelled has dropped from 90 to a ''fraction''.


But [[air crash]] causes and financial markets blow-ups are qualitatively different: air crashes causes are not necessarily human, or even sentient, and even when they are they are not ''actively searching for'' vulnerabilities in the risk monitoring landscape where no one is paying attention. If they find them, it is by chance, or undirected Brownian motion.  
But [[air crash]] causes and financial markets blow-ups are qualitatively different: air crashes causes are not necessarily human, or even sentient, and even when they are they are not ''actively searching for'' vulnerabilities in the risk monitoring landscape where no one is paying attention. If they find them, it is by chance, or undirected Brownian motion.