|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| There is no “{{isdaprov|No Agency}}” representation in the {{1992ma}}. Part of the ritual of negotiating a 92 ISDA was — in America, we imagine, ''is'' — to put one in, so when those kill-joys on {{icds}} shunted one into the {{2002ma}} it will have really ruined a few people’s days — so much so that, in some quarters, they still use the {{1992ma}} as a standard. Americans, for example.
| | {{isda 3 comp|isdaprov}} |