Template:Additional disruption events capsule: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==={{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Events}} dans une {{nutshell}}===
The important {{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Events}} are the {{eqderivprov|Triple Cocktail}}: {{eqderivprov|Change in Law}}, {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}} and {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Hedging}}. They have marginally different play-out rights:
The important {{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Events}} are the {{eqderivprov|Triple Cocktail}}: {{eqderivprov|Change in Law}}, {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}} and {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Hedging}}. They have marginally different play-out rights:
*'''{{eqderivprov|Change in Law}}''': Either party can terminate on 2 {{eqderivprov|Scheduled Trading Day}}’s notice, at the {{eqderivprov|Cancellation Amount}}.
*'''{{eqderivprov|Change in Law}}''': Either party can terminate on 2 {{eqderivprov|Scheduled Trading Day}}’s notice, at the {{eqderivprov|Cancellation Amount}}.

Latest revision as of 17:46, 27 March 2020

Additional Disruption Events dans une Nutshell

The important Additional Disruption Events are the Triple Cocktail: Change in Law, Hedging Disruption and Increased Cost of Hedging. They have marginally different play-out rights:

Okay, okay, I hear you — LOSB and ICOSB are important too. For those:

Insolvency Filing and Failure to Deliver ... well — are they even applied in your confirm?