Tort: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
You might wish to consider [[negligence]], or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting [[negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct]], for more information. | You might wish to consider [[negligence]], or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting [[negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct]], for more information. | ||
But don’t be a [[nuisance]].<ref>{{hawf}}</ref> Unless | But don’t be a [[nuisance]].<ref>{{hawf}}</ref> Unless you’re playing [[coming to the nuisance is no defence|cricket]]. | ||
C’mon, there’s some good material here folks. | C’mon, there’s some good material here folks. | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} |
Revision as of 15:44, 17 June 2021
The basic principles of tort
A Jolly Contrarian guide to loving thy neighbour™
|
Not a torte.
Nor, for that matter, a breach of contract.
You might wish to consider negligence, or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct, for more information.
But don’t be a nuisance.[1] Unless you’re playing cricket.
C’mon, there’s some good material here folks.
References
- ↑ This gag comes to you direct from our “here all week, folks!” store of corking one-liners.