Smut filter: Difference between revisions

Smut filter (view source)

191 bytes added , 4 October 2021

no edit summary

83,057

edits

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 Found term [\ss\s?h\s?i\s?t\s] in BODY_TEXT, score is 1<br>
 Number of hits for this term: 1<br>
-Matched text: shit}}}}Literally, you cannot make this shit up. The captioned message came back from a message which, confessedly, ''did'' contain the word “shit”. No objections, I guess — prudes gonna be prudes — and what good would the machines of loving grace be if they couldn’t supercharge corporate primness — but how that end is achieved by stripping out all the clean words, binning them, and telegraphing only the profane one, repeatedly, at the recipient achieves that end we can can only speculate.
+Matched text: shit}}}}Literally, you cannot make this shit up. The captioned message came back from a message is all that got through of a message which, confessedly, ''did'' contain the word “shit”. No objections, I guess — prudes gonna be prudes — and what good would the machines of loving grace be if they couldn’t at least supercharge corporate primness? — but how that puritan end is met by stripping out and binning all the clean words, and saving up, amplifying and telegraphing the only “profane”<ref>Quaint, right?</ref> one, repeatedly, at the poor fragile recipient whose delicate sense of decency the smutbot was aggressively defending in the first place, we can can only speculate.
 {{Sa}}
 *[[Email]]
 *[[All watched over by machines of loving grace]]
 {{Ref}}