Deep magic: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|g|}}Every academic discipline, every body of knowledge, every sociological power structure has its own foundational myths, and the law is no exception. There are the turtles, elephants, [[corporate veil|veils]] of company law, the deep lore and [[equity]] of the [[Chancery Division]], unimpeachable precepts of legal [[charge]]s and [[equitable mortgage]]s, the [[ontology]] of [[money]], and of course the ancient Celtic fables of [[derivatives]] and their discovery by the [[Children of the | {{a|g|}}Every academic discipline, every body of knowledge, every sociological power structure has its own foundational myths, and the law is no exception. There are the turtles, elephants, [[corporate veil|veils]] of company law, the deep lore and [[equity]] of the [[Chancery Division]], unimpeachable precepts of legal [[charge]]s and [[equitable mortgage]]s, the [[ontology]] of [[money]], and of course the ancient Celtic fables of [[derivatives]] and their discovery by the [[Children of the Woods]]. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Children of the | *[[Children of the Woods]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:05, 21 March 2023
|
Every academic discipline, every body of knowledge, every sociological power structure has its own foundational myths, and the law is no exception. There are the turtles, elephants, veils of company law, the deep lore and equity of the Chancery Division, unimpeachable precepts of legal charges and equitable mortgages, the ontology of money, and of course the ancient Celtic fables of derivatives and their discovery by the Children of the Woods.