Template:Letby dramatis personae: Difference between revisions

{{expertdef|Dr. Jane Hawdon|Consultant|Neonatology|Neutral}}<ref>{{pl|https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2024-11-12/specialist-doctor-felt-misled-about-suspicion-over-baby-deaths|Specialist doctor ‘felt misled’ about suspicion over baby deaths, Lucy Letby inquiry hears}}, ITV, 12 November 2024. Dr. Hawdon’s contemporaneous review concluded that the deaths of Babies A, I, O and P – were “unexpected and unexplained.” Her evidence to the Thirlwall Inquiry was that she may have taken a different approach to her review if she knew of the consultants’ suspicions of murder.</ref>  

{{aligntop}}

{{aligntop}}

{{expertdef|Dr. Roger Norwich|Consultant|Neonatology|Defence}}<ref name="KillerorCoincidence">{{pl|https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jul/09/lucy-letby-evidence-experts-question?|Lucy Letby: killer or coincidence? Why some experts question the evidence}} ''Guardian'' 9 Jul 2024.</ref>

| Dr. Christian Yates|| Professor || Mathematical Biology|| Independent {{cellgreen}} Defence     

{{aligntop}}

{{aligntop}}

| Dr. Peter Green|| Professor || Statistics|| Independent {{cellgreen}} Defence   

|Dr. Gillian Tully || Professor || Forensic Science || Independent {{cellgreen}} Defence  

{{aligntop}}

{{aligntop}}

{{letbyexpert|Lord Sumption| Supreme Court Judge|Criminal Law|Independent|D}}<ref>{{pl|https://t.co/UoV3lyjWpJ|Why I believe Lucy Letby is probably innocent}} ''Sunday Times'', March 30 2025.</ref>

| Dr. Faye Skelton || Professor || Criminology || Independent {{cellgreen}} Defence<ref name="ch5doc">{{pl|https://www.channel5.com/show/lucy-letby-the-new-evidence|Lucy Letby: The New Evidence}}, Channel 5, September 2024.</ref>

{{expertdef| Dr. Colin Morley|Professor|Neonatology|Defence}}<ref>{{pl|https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c89l05e97vqo|File on Four}}, BBC, 1 October 2024 </ref>

{{expertdef|Dr. Waney Squier|Consultant|Pathology|Defence}}<ref name="ch5doc"/>

{{expertdef|Dr. Matthew Orde |Consultant|Pathology|Defence}}

{{Letbyexpert|Dr. John O’Quigley|Professor|Statistics|Independent|D}}<ref>{{pl|https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00258024241242549|Suspected serial killers and unsuspected statistical blunders|}} ''Sage'', 1 April 2024.</ref>

{{letbyexpert|Dr. Carola Vinuesa|Professor|Immunology|Independent|D}}<ref>{{pl|https://x.com/carovinuesa/status/1873702814335013013|Sample post on X.com}}, December 30, 2024</ref>

{{letbyexpert|Adam King|Barrister|Criminal Law|Independent|D}}<ref>{{pl|https://web.archive.org/web/20240723234635/https://unherd.com/2024/07/the-questions-haunting-the-lucy-letby-trial/|The flaws in the Lucy Letby case}}, ''Unherd'', July 24, 2024.</ref>

{{letbyexpert|Dr. Ivan Blumenthal|Consultant|Paediatrics|Former CoCH Employee|D}}<ref>{{pl|https://www.youtube.com/@ivanblumenthal|Thoughts About Lucy Letby Parts 1-3}}, February 12, 2025.</ref>

As regular readers know, “[[consistent with]]” is often used for heavy lifting, and Ms. Moritz asks a lot of it here, concluding — these are her, and not Professor Wolfsdorf’s, words — that:

{{quote|“In other words, the surest conclusion we can draw from Baby L’s test result is that he was poisoned with insulin.”}} </ref>

|}