Lucy Letby: the handover notes: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

{{a|letby|{{wmc|Trophies for the prettiest cows and horses in the show?.jpg|Not these, yesterday.}}}}{{quote|I’ve read the [''New Yorker''] article<ref>{{new yorker article}}.</ref> and now the retrial is over I can write about it. And while there’s no doubting the author, who says she obtained full transcripts of the ten-month trial at huge cost, has researched the case thoroughly, it contains errors and cherry-picks evidence, omitting large parts of the prosecution case which was pivotal in reaching a conviction.

{{a|letby|{{audio|lucy-letby-the-handover-notes|}}{{wmc|Trophies for the prettiest cows and horses in the show?.jpg|Not these, yesterday.}}}}{{quote|I’ve read the [''New Yorker''] article<ref>{{new yorker article}}.</ref> and now the retrial is over I can write about it. And while there’s no doubting the author, who says she obtained full transcripts of the ten-month trial at huge cost, has researched the case thoroughly, it contains errors and cherry-picks evidence, omitting large parts of the prosecution case which was pivotal in reaching a conviction.

For example, it makes no mention of the 250 confidential “trophy” handover notes, blood test results and resuscitation notes relating to the babies police found at Letby’s home; it does not try to explain the Facebook searches that she made for the parents of her victims, years after she harmed their children.

Revision as of 14:15, 4 April 2025 view source3 days ago Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 90,726 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:30, 4 April 2025 view source3 days ago Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 90,726 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{a\|letby\|{{wmc\|Trophies for the prettiest cows and horses in the show?.jpg\|Not these, yesterday.}}}}{{quote\|I’ve read the [''New Yorker''] article<ref>{{new yorker article}}.</ref> and now the retrial is over I can write about it. And while there’s no doubting the author, who says she obtained full transcripts of the ten-month trial at huge cost, has researched the case thoroughly, it contains errors and cherry-picks evidence, omitting large parts of the prosecution case which was pivotal in reaching a conviction.		{{a\|letby\|{{audio\|lucy-letby-the-handover-notes\|}}{{wmc\|Trophies for the prettiest cows and horses in the show?.jpg\|Not these, yesterday.}}}}{{quote\|I’ve read the [''New Yorker''] article<ref>{{new yorker article}}.</ref> and now the retrial is over I can write about it. And while there’s no doubting the author, who says she obtained full transcripts of the ten-month trial at huge cost, has researched the case thoroughly, it contains errors and cherry-picks evidence, omitting large parts of the prosecution case which was pivotal in reaching a conviction.

	For example, it makes no mention of the 250 confidential “trophy” handover notes, blood test results and resuscitation notes relating to the babies police found at Letby’s home; it does not try to explain the Facebook searches that she made for the parents of her victims, years after she harmed their children.		For example, it makes no mention of the 250 confidential “trophy” handover notes, blood test results and resuscitation notes relating to the babies police found at Letby’s home; it does not try to explain the Facebook searches that she made for the parents of her victims, years after she harmed their children.