Off-piste

Revision as of 13:57, 25 January 2021 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|metaphor|}}The JC loves skiing. Say what you like about his privileged, stale, pale, male, out-of-touch ass. I have mixed feelings about the “off-piste” metaphor....")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The JC gets all figurative

Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

The JC loves skiing. Say what you like about his privileged, stale, pale, male, out-of-touch ass. I have mixed feelings about the “off-piste” metaphor.

In skiing it means to ski away from commercial ski-fields — typically, like miles away from them, and lifts, cafes and so on; ski-touring, with skins, avalanche gear, a rucksack and a day’s worth of food, spending more time walking up than skiing down. This is awesome, of course, but but more narrowly, being off-piste means skiing on commercial skifields, using normal lifts, cafes and what not, but just keeping away from the actually groomed, marked out runs.

For dilettantes like the JC this is less dangerous, less hard work, and a lot easier than country ski-touring. Still it requires the technique to deal with powder, crud, moguls, avoiding trees and whatnot. This is technique that 90% of skiers don’t have, and as a result, they stick to the pistes.

Okay, some maths. If one quarter of the skiable area of a given ski-field is pisted, that means there is three times as much unpisted skiing. If 90% of skiers at any time are on a piste — I have no data but I reckon this is conservative — then the pisted slopes are