Legal tech
/ˈliːgəl//tɛk/ (n.)

JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.
I have never been able to find out for sure whether Smalt was a wind up. But it must have been.
Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

1. (Vogue usage) Information technology that assists in the provision of or, more likely, delivery of, legal services. In these pages used interchangeably with “reg tech”. Both quite disappointing.

2. (Contrarian usage) Not chat-bots, AI, metadata extraction, fuzzy logic or reg tech. That’s easy: the answer is blockchain.[1] Legal technology is the real-life code that lawyers generate every day: words.

Addressing the barnacle risk

Strategic over tactical: When drafting and updating templates *always* prioritise strategic over tactical. Say a new regulation has been introduced (I mean, just imagine!) which poses the question whether an existing form should be updated:

  • really, does it? Challenge whether any change is necessary
    • on economic grounds (could we lose money? How much? Realistically, how likely?)
    • on regulatory grounds (could we be in breach of the law? What are the consequences?)
    • on reputational grounds (could this affect the firm's franchise? How?)
  • If the issue is important look to do so in a way that shortens and simplifies:
    • take out specifics and render them as general statements
    • remove optionality and complexity – this is a tech and management imperative.

See also

  1. Yes, I am trying to be funny.