Escalation threshold

Revision as of 13:47, 1 October 2021 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|gsv|}}Organisational strategy: prohibit escalations below a certain rank (or, if your organisation is foresighted enough to do away with ranks, by a certain role: team lea...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
A quixotic attempt to change the world, one iteration at a timeIndex: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Organisational strategy: prohibit escalations below a certain rank (or, if your organisation is foresighted enough to do away with ranks, by a certain role: team leader, for example.) the idea is to condition junior people to escalate up their formal command chain, making this a teachable moment within the silo. If a continued proliferation of stupid questions from the team leader, you can manage that with performance management. Insights:

  • BAU legal understanding lives in the operational function, not in the legal department.
  • The responsibility for training staff on the BAU lies with management of the operational function, not with the legal department
  • Legal is an escalation point for edge cases and emergencies. Just as you don’t consult a solicitor every day in your personal life, nor should you consult legal every day in your professional one.