Collateralised emissions obligations, were an apocryphal transaction type[1] that did not, but had it existed, surely would have, precipitated a global financial crisis, as carbon traders, hopped-up on absurd amounts of synthetic alpha blew up not just the financial markets but the entire planetary ecosystem with their leveraged bets on the squirrely commitments of G20 nations to act on climate change.
Myths and legends of the market
The JC’s guide to the foundational mythology of the markets.™
Emissions Allowance
“Wanna stop frying the planet? Start here. Will it help? Who knows? The forward curve is in contango: who cares!”
| Docs |
Take your pick: IETA, ISDA or even EFET: none of them good. But at least you have flexibility in mediocrity |
4
|
| Amendability |
Nope. The EU can amend them, but you can’t. |
0
|
| Collateral |
They aren’t anyone’s obligations as such. In fact, they’re more like a sort of unofficial, made up, (hush) crypto. No credit risk! |
DNA
|
| Transferability |
With an account at the Union Registry, sure! |
7
|
| Leverage |
Not unless you do a CEmO, and we just made that up. |
0
|
| Fright-o-meter |
Not directly scary as long as there is an EU with Greta Thundberg in it, but global warming is going to lead to Armageddon so, you know, indirectly. |
5
|
Index: Click ᐅ to expand:
|
|
“A five-times leveraged derivative of hot air!” traders would chortle, selling these things out to the most vulnerable and credulous people in society: minimum-wage hospitality workers, the elderly, the infirm, the illiterate and regional German landesbanks.
See also
- ↑ In the heady days of 2007 the JC even had this idea, ran down to the commodities trading floor to share what he thought was a tremendous joke with the structured products team. The lead structurer shook his head morosely and said, “Won’t work. We have tried and we can’t get the accounting treatment we need.”
