Template:M gen Credit Derivatives 4.5

Revision as of 09:41, 24 April 2023 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (→‎NTCE protocol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

NTCE protocol

You may see reference to “narrow tailoring” when it comes to 2014 Credit Events. Being more of a relaxed fit, wide-wheelbase, high wide and (he likes to think) handsome type of chap, talk of skim fits and snake hipped tailoring makes the JC uneasy. But all in a good cause here.

Narrowly-traded credit event, or NTCE, refers to a buried whoopsie in the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivative Definitions that reared its little button nose during a refinancing in 2017 by that scion of the New York Stock Exchange, Hovnanian Enterprises.

Hovnanian intentionally withheld a debt payment to an affiliate as part of a non-stressy refinancing. Though it was financially sound and able to make the payment, as a “Reference Entity” in the argot of the credit derivative definitions not doing so would technically constitute a Failure to Pay — a Credit Event, by any lights, although a false flag in the context of credit derivatives, which are meant to track credit deterioration.

This could trigger the unwind of credit protection, market disruption, panic on the streets and a slew of tedious silver circle client bulletins.[1]

The answer was to build into the Failure to Pay definition the requirement for “credit deterioration”. This is what the 2019 Narrowly Tailored Credit Event Supplement to the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions, which can be retrofitted to older models by means of the ISDA 2019 NTCE Protocol, does. Implementation date expected to be 13 January 2020.

  1. But nowhere near so tedious as their mountainous bulletins on regulatory margin. Enough already, guys!