Template:M premium 2002 ISDA 2(a)(iii)

How and when 2(a)(iii) is or, more to the point not, triggered.
The confusion, fear and loathing that can arising from no-one knowing whether 2(a)(iii) applies.
The confusion arising from not knowing when the condition precedent is meant to apply.
The JC’s idiosyncratic theory about why anyone thought 2(a)(iii) was a good idea in the first place.
The JC’s impassioned argument that, even if once upon a time it was, Section 2(a)(iii) is no longer fit for purpose.
How Section 2(a)(iii) held up during the sanctions extravaganza when Russia invaded Ukraine (hint: it didn’t help!)
How Section 2(a)(iii) operates in the case of non-payment-or-delivery defaults.
How corporate buyers of fully paid options might feel about 2(a)(iii) (hint: not happy!) and the sorts of amendments they might think about making if they want to feel happier
Why regulators don’t like 2(a)(iii)
What the courts think of 2(a)(iii) — in a nutshell, they are confused — plus a table comparing the six major decisions on the clause