84,211
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{eqderivprov|12.9(b)(vii)}} | === {{eqderivprov|Consequences of Change in Law or Insolvency Filing}} under Section {{eqderivprov|12.9(b)(i)}} === | ||
Your counterparties — or at any rate, their [[legal department|legal departments]] — may enjoy the intellectual challenge of jousting over the precise number of days’ notice one must give before decreeing and acting upon a {{eqderivprov|Change in Law}} or {{eqderivprov|Insolvency Filing}}. The practical reality here is that a sensible [[broker]] will be in touch with affected clients and will manage out of such a position by some kind of consent without reaching for a copy of the agreement, and a ''non''-sensible broker won’t have [[clients]] for very long, but that is not how [[legal eagles]] are conditioned to think. | |||
===Consequences of Hedging Disruption and Loss of Stock Borrow under {{eqderivprov|12.9(b)(vii)}}=== | |||
If the same event could be a {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}} ''or'' a {{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}}, it will be treated as a {{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}}. The remedies for that are marginally less stentorian. |