Template:Isda Non-defaulting Party summ

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 19:23, 6 January 2024 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "To be compared with - well, {{{{{1}}}|Defaulting Party}}. Of all things. And {{{{{1}}}|Non-affected Party}}, as well. The difference between a {{{{{1}}}|Non-defaulting Party}} and a {{{{{1}}}|Non-affected Party}}, and the linguistic torture that distinction as inflicted on the race of ISDA lawyers ever since, says everything you need to know about the absurdity of modern commercial law. *''Do say'': “the {{{{{1}}}|Non-defaulting Party}} or {{{{{1}}}|the non-Affected P...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

To be compared with - well, {{{{{1}}}|Defaulting Party}}. Of all things. And {{{{{1}}}|Non-affected Party}}, as well. The difference between a {{{{{1}}}|Non-defaulting Party}} and a {{{{{1}}}|Non-affected Party}}, and the linguistic torture that distinction as inflicted on the race of ISDA lawyers ever since, says everything you need to know about the absurdity of modern commercial law.

  • Do say: “the {{{{{1}}}|Non-defaulting Party}} or {{{{{1}}}|the non-Affected Party}}, as the case may be” over and over again.
  • Don’t say: “Is there really no other way you could get across this concept, for crying out loud?”