2010 Global Master Securities Lending Agreement: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The prevailing market standard stock lending master agreement.
{{a|gmsla|{{subtable|{{2010 GMSLA TOC}}}}}}The prevailing market standard {{tag|English law}} [[stock lending]] master agreement. Compare with the new York law {{msla}} and, latterly the English law {{pgmsla}}.


===See also===
You can access the clause-by-clause anatomy from the table of contents over ==> there.
*[[GMSLA Anatomy]]
*[[Global Master Securitites Lending Agreement]]
*{{2000gmsla}}
*{{osla}}


===Compare===
How do you say it? [[Jimzler|However you like, basically]].
*{{gmra}}
The {{gmsla}} is an agreement once drafted by a [[magic circle law firm]] but whose carriage nowadays is almost exclusively handled by [[inhouse lawyer]]s and [[negotiator]]s, to the point where seeking external advice on what a given provision means is a bad idea, because [[private practice lawyer]]s will have far less of a clue — having likely never looked at a {{gmsla}} — than will their inhouse clients who ask the question. They will be baffled by the terminology — is it a loan or isn’t it? — the fact that failing to redeliver securities or collateral is ''de rigueur'' and does not usually sifnify the [[end of the world as we know it]], that there should really not be damages for consequential losses and countless other trifling, [[tedious]] things.


 
This won’t stop the inhouse clients asking, of course, and indeed they are known to have the bright idea of outsourcing GMSLA negotiations to outside law firms. This is a disaster. Don’t ''do'' it, folks.
{{gmslaanatomy}}
{{sa}}
*[[Stock lending]]
*[[Securities financing]]
*[[Master agreement]]