AET in prime brokerage

Revision as of 16:32, 2 October 2017 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{anat|pb}} Can keep this pretty simple. *Yes, under the {{isdama}}, because it's built in (but it doesn’t really make much sense even there). *No otherwise, largely becau...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Hedge Funds & Prime Brokerage Anatomy™

{{{2}}}

There is no industry standard prime brokerage agreement, so this is not so much an anatomy as a collection of resources about an amorphous subject.
Hedge fund | AIFMD | Depositary | Prime broker | prime brokerage agreement | synthetic prime brokerage | margin lending | custody asset | CASS Anatomy | reuse & rehypothecation | hedge fund | leveraged alpha | greeks | short selling Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.


Can keep this pretty simple.

  • Yes, under the ISDA Master Agreement, because it's built in (but it doesn’t really make much sense even there).
  • No otherwise, largely because the one party who would need it is the prime broker itself and its counterparty (client), being a hedge fund will almost certainly not be in an AET jurisdiction. and the PB is relying also on.

The prime broker well may be, on the other hand - but unless the client gets charged for regulatory capital (hedge funds don't) it is better to keep the flexibility inherent in not closing out.

And the funds can pull all their positions on any day anyway.