AIFMD v UCITS: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "{{a|regulation|{{image|Dandelion girl|jpg|}}}}{{drop|A|s a comparison}} piece to our showdown between EMIR v MIFID we offer you our UCITS v AIFMD showdown. These are of course the flagship regulations for EU for investment fund regulation. Generally speaking, UCITS is for retail investment funds — think granddad dandling grandchildren on knees, nostalgic glamour-glow photos of children blowing on dandelions and so on — and is, therefore, more restrictive th...")
 
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
That said investment funds are investment funds however much money you have to put in them so there are some commonalities between the regimes — the need, for example, to have a depositary to hold cash and assets in either case — where there are equivalent provisions,  AIFMD’s tend to be laxer, and more contract-outable-from.  
That said investment funds are investment funds however much money you have to put in them so there are some commonalities between the regimes — the need, for example, to have a depositary to hold cash and assets in either case — where there are equivalent provisions,  AIFMD’s tend to be laxer, and more contract-outable-from.  


{{sa}}
*[[AIFMD]]
*[[UCITS]]
*[[MIFID v EMIR]]
==That table in full==
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Comparison between UCITS and AIFMD
|+ Comparison between UCITS and AIFMD
Line 34: Line 40:
| Regulatory Authority || National competent authorities (NCAs) and ESMA for certain aspects || National competent authorities (NCAs) for regulation and oversight  
| Regulatory Authority || National competent authorities (NCAs) and ESMA for certain aspects || National competent authorities (NCAs) for regulation and oversight  
|}
|}
{{sa}}
*[[AIFMD]]
*[[UCITS]]
*[[MIFID v EMIR]]