AIFMD v UCITS: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

AIFMD v UCITS (view source)

Revision as of 11:13, 3 May 2024

2 bytes added , 3 May

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,891

edits

Revision as of 11:12, 3 May 2024 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 11:13, 3 May 2024 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{a\|~~regulation~~\|}}{{drop\|A\|s a comparison}} piece to our showdown between [[EMIR v MIFID]] we offer you our [[UCITS v AIFMD]] showdown. These are of course the flagship regulations for EU for investment fund regulation.		{{a\|euregulation\|}}{{drop\|A\|s a comparison}} piece to our showdown between [[EMIR v MIFID]] we offer you our [[UCITS v AIFMD]] showdown. These are of course the flagship regulations for EU for investment fund regulation.

	Generally speaking, UCITS is for retail investment funds — think granddad dandling grandchildren on knees, nostalgic glamour-glow photos of children blowing on dandelions and so on — and is, therefore, more restrictive than AIFMD, which is for hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds and [[collective investment scheme]]s that are not in scope for UCITS, because wistful granddads cannot reasonably invest in them.		Generally speaking, UCITS is for retail investment funds — think granddad dandling grandchildren on knees, nostalgic glamour-glow photos of children blowing on dandelions and so on — and is, therefore, more restrictive than AIFMD, which is for hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds and [[collective investment scheme]]s that are not in scope for UCITS, because wistful granddads cannot reasonably invest in them.