82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[All or substantially all]] is a modifier [[calculated]] to snooker that smart Alec who, for example, sells his entire business barring a single chair, to avoid breaching a covenant preventing him from disposing of “all of the business”. This is not the behaviour of a [[good egg]] and the better question to ask yourself is why you did business with {{sex|him}} in the first place. | [[All or substantially all]] is a modifier [[calculated]] to snooker that smart Alec who, for example, sells his entire business barring a single chair, to avoid breaching a covenant preventing him from disposing of “all of the business”. This is not the behaviour of a [[good egg]] and the better question to ask yourself is why you did business with {{sex|him}} in the first place. | ||
In any case, your qualifier leads only to a different kind of uncertainty: what counts as “[[substantial]]”? Discussions on the in-any-case [[tedious]] topic of {{isdaprov|Credit Event Upon Merger}} tend quickly to go this way. The countless learned articles and [[client briefing note]]s on the topic ({{google2|all|substantially}}) will tell you that the benefit of this kind of drafting accrues mainly to [[Mediocre lawyer|those in the legal profession]], but even then only through their very fear and loathing of the notion. | In any case, your qualifier leads only to a different kind of uncertainty: what counts as “[[substantial]]”? Discussions on the in-any-case [[tedious]] topic of {{isdaprov|Credit Event Upon Merger}} and {{isdaprov|Merger Without Assumption}} tend quickly to go this way. The countless learned articles and [[client briefing note]]s on the topic ({{google2|all|substantially}}) will tell you that the benefit of this kind of drafting accrues mainly to [[Mediocre lawyer|those in the legal profession]], but even then only through their very fear and loathing of the notion. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} |