|
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Line 8: |
Line 8: |
| On this view, there is no statement so bleeding obvious it can be safely left unsaid. | | On this view, there is no statement so bleeding obvious it can be safely left unsaid. |
|
| |
|
| [[All or substantially all]] is a modifier [[calculated]] to snooker that smart Alec who, for example, sells his entire business barring a single chair, to avoid breaching a covenant preventing him from disposing of “all of the business”. This is not the behaviour of a [[good egg]] and the better question to ask yourself is why you did business with {{sex|him}} in the first place.
| | {{All or substantially all capsule}} |
|
| |
|
| In any case, your qualifier leads only to a different kind of uncertainty: what counts as “[[substantial]]”? Discussions on the in-any-case [[tedious]] topic of {{isdaprov|Credit Event Upon Merger}} and {{isdaprov|Merger Without Assumption}} tend quickly to go this way. The countless learned articles and [[client briefing note]]s on the topic ({{google2|all|substantially}}) will tell you that the benefit of this kind of drafting accrues mainly to [[Mediocre lawyer|those in the legal profession]], but even then only through their very fear and loathing of the notion.
| |
|
| |
|
| {{sa}} | | {{sa}} |