Artificial intelligence: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Artificial intelligence (view source)

Revision as of 21:09, 1 January 2024

504 bytes added , 1 January

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,891

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{a|technology|}}{{quote|The automatic pilot is not much help with hijackers.
+{{a|technology|{{image|Cricket prediction|png|''Why'' your job is safe: [[AI]] might whup [[Go]] grand-masters, but they don’t understand [[cricket]].}}}}
-:—{{author|John Gall}}, {{br|Systemantics: The Systems Bible}}}}{{d|Artificial intelligence|/ɑːtɪˈfɪʃ(ə)l ɪnˈtɛlɪdʒ(ə)ns/|n||[[File:Cricket prediction.png|450px|thumb|center|''Why'' your job is safe: [[AI]] might whup [[Go]] grand-masters, but they don’t understand [[cricket]].]]}}1. An [[algorithm]] which deduces that, since you bought sneakers on Amazon last week, carpet-bombing every cranny of your cyber-scape with advertisements for trainers you no longer need is an effective form of advertising. For ''next'' time. <br>
+{{Quote|“Look, good against remotes is one thing, good against the living, that’s something else.”
-. The [[technology]] employed by [[social media]] platforms like [[LinkedIn]] to save you the bother of composing your own unctuous endorsements of people you once met at a [[business day convention]] and who have just [[share]]d the stimulating time they’ve had at a [[panel discussion]] on the operational challenges of regulatory reporting under the [[securities financing transactions regulation]], by composing an unctuous reply for you. “''So'' inspiring!”
+:—Han Solo}}
-. '''[[Machines are fungible]]'''.
+{{quote|The automatic pilot is not much help with hijackers.
+:—{{author|John Gall}}, {{br|Systemantics: The Systems Bible}}}}{{d|Artificial intelligence|/ɑːtɪˈfɪʃ(ə)l ɪnˈtɛlɪdʒ(ə)ns/|n|}}
-Stand by for an essay.
+. An [[algorithm]] which deduces that, since you bought sneakers on Amazon last week, carpet-bombing every cranny of your cyber-scape with advertisements for trainers you no longer need is an effective form of advertising. <br>
+. The [[technology]] employed by [[social media]] platforms like [[LinkedIn]] to save you the bother of composing your own unctuous endorsements of people you once met at a [[business day convention]] and who have just [[share]]d the stimulating time they’ve had at a [[panel discussion]] on the operational challenges of regulatory reporting under the [[securities financing transactions regulation]], by composing an unctuous reply for you. “''So'' inspiring!” <br>
+. '''[[Machines are fungible]]'''. <br>
+. Oh help me we lawyers are all doomed because of ChatGPT-3
+Stand by for an essay. But first, answer this: why do we insist on making things ''easy'' for the machines? We seem progressively to be expected to align ourselves to the affordances and capabilities of machines to ''appraise'' ourselves on how good we are at things we know machines excel at. And then we are surprised, and alarmed, when machines can pass the bar exam.
 ==The ''practical'' reason [[why your job is safe]]==