82,891
edits
Artificial intelligence: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|technology| | {{a|technology|{{image|Cricket prediction|png|''Why'' your job is safe: [[AI]] might whup [[Go]] grand-masters, but they don’t understand [[cricket]].}}}} | ||
{{Quote|“Look, good against remotes is one thing, good against the living, that’s something else.” | |||
:—Han Solo}} | |||
{{quote|The automatic pilot is not much help with hijackers. | |||
:—{{author|John Gall}}, {{br|Systemantics: The Systems Bible}}}}{{d|Artificial intelligence|/ɑːtɪˈfɪʃ(ə)l ɪnˈtɛlɪdʒ(ə)ns/|n|}} | :—{{author|John Gall}}, {{br|Systemantics: The Systems Bible}}}}{{d|Artificial intelligence|/ɑːtɪˈfɪʃ(ə)l ɪnˈtɛlɪdʒ(ə)ns/|n|}} | ||
| Line 7: | Line 10: | ||
4. Oh help me we lawyers are all doomed because of ChatGPT-3 | 4. Oh help me we lawyers are all doomed because of ChatGPT-3 | ||
Stand by for an essay. | Stand by for an essay. But first, answer this: why do we insist on making things ''easy'' for the machines? We seem progressively to be expected to align ourselves to the affordances and capabilities of machines to ''appraise'' ourselves on how good we are at things we know machines excel at. And then we are surprised, and alarmed, when machines can pass the bar exam. | ||
==The ''practical'' reason [[why your job is safe]]== | ==The ''practical'' reason [[why your job is safe]]== | ||