Awards: Difference between revisions

24 bytes added ,  10 April 2017
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
It must be nice to have doubts that are so easily quashed. These awards are “judged” anonymously, without reference to published criteria and awarded to persons who usually don’t have obvious merit in their nominated field — beyond representing a prolific advertiser — at all, let alone to such a degree to warrant being lionised so aggravatingly.
It must be nice to have doubts that are so easily quashed. These awards are “judged” anonymously, without reference to published criteria and awarded to persons who usually don’t have obvious merit in their nominated field — beyond representing a prolific advertiser — at all, let alone to such a degree to warrant being lionised so aggravatingly.


These awards foster unconscionable behavior too: The humble-bragging by the recipient on LinkedIn or the Corporate Intranet; ostentatious brown-nosing from inferiors and those keen to build [[network]]  
These awards foster unconscionable behavior too: The humble-bragging by the recipient on LinkedIn or the Corporate Intranet; ostentatious brown-nosing from inferiors and those keen to build their [[network]]s
 
{{ref}}
{{egg}}




{{egg}}
{{egg}}