Banque Worms v BankAmerica International: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|casenote|{{citer|Banque Worms|BankAmerica International|2d Cir. 1991|928 F.2d 538}}[[File:Can of Banque Worms.png|450px|thumb|center|A can of Banque Worms yesterday. (The decision, not the Banque, obviously)]]}}This case, fondly known to [[restitution]] fans and other obstreperous rascals of the financial services industry as ''[[Banque Worms]]'' involved a [[revolving credit facility]] between one Spedley and the Banque.  
{{a|casenote|[[File:Can of Banque Worms.png|450px|thumb|center|{{citer|Banque Worms|BankAmerica International|2d Cir. 1991|928 F.2d|538}} opening a can of [[Banque Worms]] yesterday.]]}}This case, fondly known to [[restitution]] fans and other obstreperous rascals of the financial services industry as ''[[Banque Worms]]'' involved a [[revolving credit facility]] between one Spedley, an Australian, and the Banque, who was, then, French.<Ref>And seems to have dissolved into history since.</ref>
 
===Facts===
===Facts===
In 1989, Banque Worms informed Spedley that it would not be renewing the [[revolver]] and demanded payment of the outstanding balance on April 10, 1989.
In 1989, [[Banque Worms]] informed Spedley that it would not be renewing the [[revolver]] and demanded payment of the outstanding balance on April 10, 1989.


On 10 April 1989, at 12:36 am,<ref>Yes, I was thinking that too. These dudes work crazy hours. A mistake was bound to happen.</ref> Spedley instructed its bank, SPI, to wire the total amount due to the Banque at its BankAmerica account. By 3:37 am the same day – not three hours later – Spedley had a change of heart and instructed SPI to stop payment to Banque Worms and instead make a payment in the same amount to National Westminster Bank USA.”
On 10 April 1989, at 12:36 am,<ref>Yes, I was thinking that too. These dudes work crazy hours. A mistake was bound to happen.</ref> Spedley instructed its bank, SPI, to wire the total amount due to the Banque at its BankAmerica account. By 3:37 am the same day – not three hours later – Spedley had a change of heart and instructed SPI to stop payment to Banque Worms and instead make a payment in the same amount to National Westminster Bank USA.”
Line 31: Line 30:


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[discharge-for-value defense]]
*[[Stupid banker cases]]
*[[Discharge-for-value defense]]
*[[Revolving credit facility]]
*[[Revolving credit facility]]
 
*{{casenote|Citigroup|Brigade Capital Management}}
*{{casenote|Barclays Bank Ltd|WJ Simms}}
{{Ref}}
{{Ref}}
{{c2|Stupid bankers|Restitution}}