Banter is good: Difference between revisions

Banter is good (view source)

230 bytes added , 13 April

no edit summary

82,891

edits

Revision as of 13:33, 13 April 2024 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:42, 13 April 2024 (view source) Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Newer edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:

	The Financial Times responded by publishing a post that read ”Lv Abrdn aln” (Leave Abrdn alone), while City AM ran with a front page on Tuesday that read “Abrdn: an apology - sry we kp tkng th pss ot of yr mssng vwls”.}}		The Financial Times responded by publishing a post that read ”Lv Abrdn aln” (Leave Abrdn alone), while City AM ran with a front page on Tuesday that read “Abrdn: an apology - sry we kp tkng th pss ot of yr mssng vwls”.}}
	{{Drop\|W\|e live in an}} age of stupidity.		{{Drop\|W\|e live in an}} age of stupidity. Charlatanry. Bad ideas — not just bad but incoherent ideas — show unusual resilience — cryptocurrency, stakeholder capitalism, data determinism, techno-uptopianism political empathy, critical theory psychological safety —