Basic Representations - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fullanat2|isda|3(a)|2002|3(a)|1992}}
{{nman|isda|2002|3(a)}}
An observant negotiator (is there any other kind?) handling a {{1992ma}} might wish to add a new agency rep as Section {{isdaprov|3(a)(vi)}}. The framers of the {{isdama}} obviously thought this was such a good idea that they added a brand-new no-agency rep to the {{2002ma}}, only they can’t have felt it was basic enough to go in the {{isdaprov|Basic Representations}}, so they put it in a new clause all by itself at Section {{isdaprov|3(g)}}.
 
But you don’t need a bespoke no-agency rep if you’re on a {{2002ma}}, if that’s what you’re wondering.
 
{{ISDA 2002 Section 3 TOC}}