|
|
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{fullanat2|isda|3(a)|2002|3(a)|1992}} | | {{nman|isda|2002|3(a)}} |
| An observant negotiator (is there any other kind?) handling a {{1992ma}} might wish to add a new agency rep as Section {{isdaprov|3(a)(vi)}}. The framers of the {{isdama}} obviously thought this was such a good idea that they added a brand-new no-agency rep to the {{2002ma}}, only they can’t have felt it was basic enough to go in the {{isdaprov|Basic Representations}}, so they put it in a new clause all by itself at Section {{isdaprov|3(g)}}.
| |
| | |
| But you don’t need a bespoke no-agency rep if you’re on a {{2002ma}}, if that’s what you’re wondering.
| |
| | |
| {{ISDA 2002 Section 3 TOC}}
| |