Beneficial ownership: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}Under {{tag|English law}} there is a distinction between [[legal ownership]] and [[beneficial ownership]]. The legal owner is the person in whose name [[Title transfer|title]] to the asset is formally registered. The beneficial owner is the person (and in most cases, it’s the same person) who has the effective benefit of the asset: not just its economic risks and rewards, but the effective right to deal with it absolutely.
{{a|trust|}}Under {{tag|English law}} there is a distinction between [[legal ownership]] and [[beneficial ownership]]. The legal owner is the person in whose name [[Title transfer|title]] to the asset is formally registered. The beneficial owner is the person (and in most cases, it’s the same person) who has the effective benefit of the asset: not just its economic risks and rewards, but the effective right to deal with it absolutely.


This might seem an artificial, somewhat fatuous distinction — certainly, continental lawyers think so: there’s no concept of that separation at all in the [[civil law]] tradition<ref>But just try asking them to explain therefore what the hell they think a [[fiduciary]] is.</ref> — but it is this very distinction on which the idea of a {{t|trust}} is founded. The [[Trustee]] legally owns the trust property, but it does not form part of the trustee’s [[insolvency estate]].
This might seem an artificial, somewhat fatuous distinction — certainly, continental lawyers think so: there’s no concept of that separation at all in the [[civil law]] tradition<ref>But just try asking them to explain therefore what the hell they think a [[fiduciary]] is.</ref> — but it is this very distinction on which the idea of a {{t|trust}} is founded. The [[Trustee]] legally owns the trust property, but it does not form part of the trustee’s [[insolvency estate]].