Blockbusters: Why Big Hits and Big Risks are the Future of the Entertainment Business: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{review|Blockbusters: Why Big Hits - and Big Risks - Are the Future of the Entertainment Business|Anita Elberse|R37SZE2OLOTDTN|25 April 2014|Contra {{bookreview|The Long Tail}}: the Fat Head.}}
{{review|Blockbusters: Why Big Hits - and Big Risks - Are the Future of the Entertainment Business|Anita Elberse|R37SZE2OLOTDTN|25 April 2014|Contra {{bookreview|The Long Tail}}: the Fat Head.}}
======
 
If you’re the sort of person who sees only one movie a year, that movie is unlikely to be ''Dersu Uzala''.
If you only see one movie a year, it’s not likely to be ''Dersu Uzala''.


If you are a movie executive, this ought not to rock your world. It certainly isn't a function of the information revolution, and would have been as true when Derzu Uzala was released in 1976 as it is today. Yet it is the intellectual cornerstone of {{author|Anita Elberse}}’s provocative new book “Blockbusters” which, while dismantling the new-age canard of the [[Long Tail]], is otherwise far less overwhelming than the commentariat seems to believe.
If you are a movie executive, this ought not to rock your world. It certainly isn't a function of the information revolution, and would have been as true when Derzu Uzala was released in 1976 as it is today. Yet it is the intellectual cornerstone of {{author|Anita Elberse}}’s provocative new book “Blockbusters” which, while dismantling the new-age canard of the [[Long Tail]], is otherwise far less overwhelming than the commentariat seems to believe.