CFTC Representations: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:
===Points to note on Jurisdiction===
===Points to note on Jurisdiction===
*The governing law of an {{isdama}} or Transaction [[Confirmation]], and the jurisdiction of incorporation of either party '''does not affect the applicability of the [[CEA]]'''.   
*The governing law of an {{isdama}} or Transaction [[Confirmation]], and the jurisdiction of incorporation of either party '''does not affect the applicability of the [[CEA]]'''.   
*There are certain limited circumstances where the [[CEA]] and {{tag|CFTC}} regulation does not apply.  However, Barclays’ trade monitoring systems are generally not set up in such a way to ensure compliance with these particular exceptions.  
*There are certain limited circumstances where the [[CEA]] and {{tag|CFTC}} regulation does not apply.  However, it is difficult to monitor and a firm's systems may not set up in such a way to ensure compliance with these particular exceptions.  
*Accordingly, we request the inclusion of these provisions in all {{isdama}}s.
*Accordingly, we request the inclusion of these provisions in all {{isdama}}s.


Line 54: Line 54:
The '''[[Eligible Commercial Entity]]''' (“'''ECE'''”) representation is needed  in the {{isdama}} for any entity that intends to transact on a principal to principal basis in an [[Exempt Commodity]] on an [[Electronic Trading Facility]] (an electronic trade matching and execution platform for OTC derivative transactions) in order to ensure the transactions will be exempt from most provisions of the [[CEA]].   
The '''[[Eligible Commercial Entity]]''' (“'''ECE'''”) representation is needed  in the {{isdama}} for any entity that intends to transact on a principal to principal basis in an [[Exempt Commodity]] on an [[Electronic Trading Facility]] (an electronic trade matching and execution platform for OTC derivative transactions) in order to ensure the transactions will be exempt from most provisions of the [[CEA]].   


[[ECE]]s are subset of [[ECP]]s including, among others, entities who have a demonstrable ability to make or take delivery of the underlying [[commodity]], or to incur risk in addition to price risk related to the [[commodity]], or are dealers regularly providing risk management or hedging services to or engaging in market-making activities with other eligible commercial entities.  Because Barclays does not have systems to monitor and track which clients have made the representation and which have not, the representation must be included in all {{tag|ISDA}}s.
[[ECE]]s are subset of [[ECP]]s including, among others, entities who have a demonstrable ability to make or take delivery of the underlying [[commodity]], or to incur risk in addition to price risk related to the [[commodity]], or are dealers regularly providing risk management or hedging services to or engaging in market-making activities with other eligible commercial entities.   
 
===[[ECE]] Rep wording===
===[[ECE]] Rep wording===
{{quote|'''Additional Representations'''.  Each party will be deemed to represent to the other party on each date on which a Transaction is entered into that: ...
{{quote|'''Additional Representations'''.  Each party will be deemed to represent to the other party on each date on which a Transaction is entered into that: ...
Line 65: Line 66:
If the parties do not meet the applicable ECP and/or ECE requirement the commodity transaction is considered an illegal off-exchange transaction.  
If the parties do not meet the applicable ECP and/or ECE requirement the commodity transaction is considered an illegal off-exchange transaction.  


Barclays and the counterparty may be subject to fines from the {{tag|CFTC}} and the trade could be considered void.  
There may be fines from the {{tag|CFTC}} and the trade could be considered void.  


The {{tag|CFTC}} Enforcement Division is able to impose significant fines, up to $1MM per day per violation of the CEA. To date, we are not aware of any fines being imposed at this level for this issue but the {{tag|CFTC}} has only relatively recently acquired the ability to impose these hefty fines and we are seeing some very large3 fines being imposed for other violations.  
The {{tag|CFTC}} Enforcement Division is able to impose significant fines, up to $1MM per day per violation of the CEA. To date, we are not aware of any fines being imposed at this level for this issue but the {{tag|CFTC}} has only relatively recently acquired the ability to impose these hefty fines and we are seeing some very large3 fines being imposed for other violations.  


Additionally, there are US cases were a party to a trade has walked away from the deal claiming it was an illegal off-exchange transaction. Barclays has also experienced this claim first hand with a major European Bank claiming an agriculture option trade was void due to Barclays and the counterparty bank not meeting the Agriculture Option exemption requirements in the {{tag|CFTC}} Rules. Barclays was forced to terminate the transaction for no value after there had been a significant market move in our favor.
Additionally, there are US cases were a party to a trade has walked away from the deal claiming it was an illegal off-exchange transaction.  


=See Also=
=See Also=