Calculations - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{isdaanat|6(d)}}
{{isdaanat|6(d)}} Here is a {{Diff|35638|35639}} between the 1992 and 2002 versions.
A popular parlour game amongst those [[negotiator|pedants]] who still insist on using the {{1992ma}}<ref>Or, in fairness, are ''forced to'' by some other pedant further up the chain, or a general institutional disposition towards pedantry.</ref> is to laboriously upgrade every inconsistent provision to the {{2002ma}} standard.  
A popular parlour game amongst those [[negotiator|pedants]] who still insist on using the {{1992ma}}<ref>Or, in fairness, are ''forced to'' by some other pedant further up the chain, or a general institutional disposition towards pedantry.</ref> is to laboriously upgrade every inconsistent provision to the {{2002ma}} standard.  


Line 6: Line 6:
This clause has nothing to do with [[grace period]]s and everything to do with {{isdaprov|Loss}} and {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} ({{1992ma}}) or {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}}s ({{2002ma}}) so expect to see it modified. Wiki DV set out below.
This clause has nothing to do with [[grace period]]s and everything to do with {{isdaprov|Loss}} and {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} ({{1992ma}}) or {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}}s ({{2002ma}}) so expect to see it modified. Wiki DV set out below.


Here is a {{Diff|35638|35639}} between the 1992 and 2002 versions
 


<small>'''Previous''':  {{isdaprov|6(a)}}  |  {{isdaprov|6(b)}}  |  {{isdaprov|6(c)}}  '''Next''':  {{isdaprov|6(e)}} </small>
<small>'''Previous''':  {{isdaprov|6(a)}}  |  {{isdaprov|6(b)}}  |  {{isdaprov|6(c)}}  '''Next''':  {{isdaprov|6(e)}} </small>
{{ref}}
{{ref}}