|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{isdaanat|6(d)}}'''Comparison''': Here is a {{Diff|35638|35639}} between the 1992 and 2002 versions. | | {{manual|MI|2002|6(d)Section|6(d)|medium}} |
| A popular parlour game amongst those [[negotiator|pedants]] who still insist on using the {{1992ma}}<ref>Or, in fairness, are ''forced to'' by some other pedant further up the chain, or a general institutional disposition towards pedantry.</ref> is to laboriously upgrade every inconsistent provision to the {{2002ma}} standard.
| |
| | |
| You might well ask why, but then you might well ask why anybody watches films from the ''Fast and Furious'' franchise. ''Because they can''. Or, possibly, to preserve the slightly more generous [[grace period]]s for {{isdaprov|Failure to Pay}}<ref>Three days in the {{1992ma}} versus one in the {{2002ma}}.</ref> and {{isdaprov|Bankruptcy}}<ref>Thirty days in the {{1992ma}} versus 15 in the {{2002ma}}.</ref> (in which case, downgrade the new version, wouldn't you? But no).
| |
| | |
| This clause has nothing to do with [[grace period]]s and everything to do with {{isdaprov|Loss}} and {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} ({{1992ma}}) or {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}}s ({{2002ma}}) so expect to see it modified. Wiki DV set out below.
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| <small>'''Previous''': {{isdaprov|6(a)}} | {{isdaprov|6(b)}} | {{isdaprov|6(c)}} '''Next''': {{isdaprov|6(e)}} </small>
| |
| {{ref}}
| |