Calculations - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fullanat2|isda|6(d)|2002|6(d)|1992}}
{{fullanat2|isda|6(d)|2002|6(d)|1992}}
<small>'''Previous''':  {{isdaprov|6(a)}}  |  {{isdaprov|6(b)}}  |  {{isdaprov|6(c)}}  '''Next''':  {{isdaprov|6(e)}} </small>
<small>'''Previous''':  {{isdaprov|6(a)}}  |  {{isdaprov|6(b)}}  |  {{isdaprov|6(c)}}  '''Next''':  {{isdaprov|6(e)}} </small>
A popular parlour game amongst those [[negotiator|pedants]] who insist on using the {{1992ma}} is to laboriously upgrade every inconsistent provision to the {{2002ma}} standard. You might well ask why, but then you might well ask why anybody watches films from the ''Fast and Furious'' franchise. ''Because they can''.  Or possibly to preserve the slightly more generous [[grace period]]s for {{isdaprov|Failure to Pay}} or {{isdaprov|Bankruptcy}} (in which case, downgrade the new version, wouldn't you?But no).
{{Diff}}
{{Diff}}


[[File:Payment Date diff.png|center|thumb|450px|Differences between {{1992ma}} and {{2002ma}}]]
[[File:Payment Date diff.png|center|thumb|450px|Differences between {{1992ma}} and {{2002ma}}]]