Cancellation Amount - Equity Derivatives Provision: Difference between revisions

Cancellation Amount - Equity Derivatives Provision (view source)

Revision as of 10:01, 17 April 2020

22 bytes added , 17 April 2020

no edit summary

Amwelladmin

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

82,882

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{eqderivanat|12.8(a)}}
-{{eqderivprov|Cancellation Amount}} is a beast of a definition. But when you boil it down, it's pretty straightforward. It applies when terminating a transaction following an {{eqderivprov|Extraordinary Event}} or an {{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Event}}.
+{{eqderivprov|Cancellation Amount}} is a beast of a definition. But when you boil it down, it’s pretty straightforward. It applies when terminating a {{eqderivprov|Transaction}} following an {{eqderivprov|Extraordinary Event}} or an {{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Event}}.
 Importantly, by dint of Section {{eqderivprov|12.8(e)}}, the {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}} may pass through hedge breakage costs and losses.
-If it's a beast under 2002, it's worse under the (ill fated) [[2011 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions]]. Quoth [[Clifford Chance]]:
+If it’s a beast under 2002, it’s worse under the (ill fated) [[2011 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions]]. Quoth [[Clifford Chance]]:
 :“This provision has been amended heavily and now runs to over 10 pages. It sets out different optional methods of calculating the transaction value, rather than following a purely replacement value approach (as under the 2002 Definitions) which was considered not to be appropriate in all cases. Greater detail is also provided as to how and when the {{eqderivprov|Cancellation Amount}} is to be determined, what data is to be taken into account and how losses/gains resulting from hedge close-outs are allocated.”