82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{eqderivprov|Cancellation Amount}} is a beast of a definition. But when you boil it down, it's pretty straightforward. It applies when terminating a transaction following an {{eqderivprov|Extraordinary Event}} or an {{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Event}}. | {{eqderivprov|Cancellation Amount}} is a beast of a definition. But when you boil it down, it's pretty straightforward. It applies when terminating a transaction following an {{eqderivprov|Extraordinary Event}} or an {{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Event}}. | ||
If it's a beast under 2002, it's worse under the (ill fated) [[ISDA | If it's a beast under 2002, it's worse under the (ill fated) [[2011 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions]]. Quoth [[Clifford Chance]]: | ||
:“This provision has been amended heavily and now runs to over 10 pages. It sets out different optional methods of calculating the transaction value, rather than following a purely replacement value approach (as under the 2002 Definitions) which was considered not to be appropriate in all cases. Greater detail is also provided as to how and when the {{eqderivprov|Cancellation Amount}} is to be determined, what data is to be taken into account and how losses/gains resulting from hedge close-outs are allocated.” | :“This provision has been amended heavily and now runs to over 10 pages. It sets out different optional methods of calculating the transaction value, rather than following a purely replacement value approach (as under the 2002 Definitions) which was considered not to be appropriate in all cases. Greater detail is also provided as to how and when the {{eqderivprov|Cancellation Amount}} is to be determined, what data is to be taken into account and how losses/gains resulting from hedge close-outs are allocated.” |