Capacity: Difference between revisions

177 bytes added ,  24 June 2019
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Now this presents issues if you will look to your {{t|contract}} to enforce this warranty. For if your client was without the [[capacity]] to enter into your {{t|contract}} — to be sure, for commercial enterprises in sensible jurisdictions, a vanishingly remote contingency these days, but it can happen if you ply your trade with [[local authorities]] — then its ''contractual'' warranty that it ''had'' that [[capacity]] doesn’t get off the launch pad: You have a [[chicken-licken]] and egg problem.  
Now this presents issues if you will look to your {{t|contract}} to enforce this warranty. For if your client was without the [[capacity]] to enter into your {{t|contract}} — to be sure, for commercial enterprises in sensible jurisdictions, a vanishingly remote contingency these days, but it can happen if you ply your trade with [[local authorities]] — then its ''contractual'' warranty that it ''had'' that [[capacity]] doesn’t get off the launch pad: You have a [[chicken-licken]] and egg problem.  


Often combined with the {{repprov|authority}} representation into a [[capacity and authority]] rep. But they’re quite different things, in this commentator’s pedantic view.


{{Seealso}}
{{Seealso}}