Celery: Difference between revisions

294 bytes added ,  8 September 2022
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
See {{f|flannel}}. A good {{tag|metaphor}} for bad legal writing: it does no harm, but no good either<ref>which is a {{tag|paradox}} itself, for words that do no harm but do no good get in the way, which is ''in itself'' harmful.</ref>.  If you go to the store, [[celery]] is on your list, and they have none, it is not something you feel the need to [[I'm not going to die in a ditch about it|die in a ditch about]].
{{a|drafting|{{image|Celery|png|Some multidimensional celery, yesterday}}}}{{d|Celery|/ˈsɛləri/|n|}}
 
A good {{tag|metaphor}} for bad legal writing: it does no harm, but no good either<ref>which is a {{tag|paradox}} itself, for words that do no harm but do no good get in the way, which is ''in itself'' harmful.</ref>.  If you go to the store, [[celery]] is on your list, and they have none, it is not something you feel the need to [[I'm not going to die in a ditch about it|die in a ditch about]]. In a way “cabbage” is a better term, because it has worse connotations, but dammit the JC ''likes'' cabbage. Fried in olive oil with carraway seeds, it goes well with bangers and mash.


[[Celery]] comes in all shapes and sizes, and can go [[limp celery|limp]] if left unattended.
[[Celery]] comes in all shapes and sizes, and can go [[limp celery|limp]] if left unattended.
Line 7: Line 9:


Despite its recurring popularity in dieting guides, there is no scientific evidence supporting the idea that ''any'' food is calorically negative. Sorry to prick that bubble, fellahs.
Despite its recurring popularity in dieting guides, there is no scientific evidence supporting the idea that ''any'' food is calorically negative. Sorry to prick that bubble, fellahs.
{{sa}}
*[[Calorie-negative foods]]


{{plainenglish}}
{{ref}}
{{ref}}