Change adoption: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|
{{a|devil|
[[File:Blackberry.jpg|450px|frameless|center]]
[[File:Blackberry.jpg|450px|frameless|center]]
}}And observation which owns something to {{author|Peter Thiel}}’s excellent {{br|Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future}}, we hypothesise that for any [[Meatsack|user]] to adopt new technology, it must immediately or, at any rate, ''quickly'' and within easy reach of that user’s imagination horizon — make that user’s life incontestably better.
}}And observation which owns something to {{author|Peter Thiel}}’s excellent {{br|Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future}}, we hypothesise that for any [[Meatsack|user]] to adopt new technology, it must immediately or, at any rate, ''quickly'' and within easy reach of that user’s [[Adjacent possible|imagination horizon]] — make that user’s life incontestably better.


It is the [[JC]]’s firm contention that we, and certainly our [[thought leader]]s, systematically discount the significance of innovation that has bedded into the market. This is the only possible explanation for the widespread conviction that the legal market has not innovated in the last 30 years.
It is the [[JC]]’s firm contention that we, and certainly our [[thought leader]]s, systematically discount the significance of innovation that has already bedded into the market. This is the only possible explanation for the widespread conviction that the legal market has not innovated in the last 30 years. Why? well, our cynical view that once bedded-down, its glamour, novelty, potential efficiency and monetisability is gone: it ceases to be an ''opportunity'' and starts to be ''furniture''.  


Where a new bit of kit offers immediate benefits, [[legal eagle]]s will be over it like a rash. Take the BlackBerry: The [[JC]] is old enough to remember when a couple of investment banking MDs in New York acquired these little alien things in mid 2002. ''Mobile email? Are you kidding me?'' Within nine months every bastard in the firm had one and no face-to-face meeting could last longer than seven minutes before losing every participant to the little screen. They were called “crackberries” for reason.  
''No-one wants hot-takes about furniture.''
 
There is, still, a precious moment of transition: Where a new bit of kit offers immediate benefits, [[legal eagle]]s will be over it like a rash. Take the [[BlackBerry]]: The [[JC]] is old enough to remember when a couple of investment banking MDs in New York acquired these little alien things in mid 2002.
 
''Mobile email? Are you kidding me?''
 
Within nine months every bastard in the firm had one and no face-to-face meeting could last longer than seven minutes before losing every participant to the little screen. They were called “crackberries” for a good reason. Likewise email, the internet, [[delta-view]] and working from home. They went down the eagley gullet without touching the sides. No-one needed to take anyone on a [[change journey]]. The eaglery saw it, got it, and adopted it immediately.
 
You could argue the BlackBerry single-handedly did away with “close of business” as any kind of barrier to commerce. Suddenly, everyone was reachable, 24/7 wherever they were and whatever they were doing. This new capability: the ability to respond instantly, from wherever, promised to put the deal execution into hyperdrive.
 
But did it?


Likewise email, the internet, [[delta-view]] and working from home. They went down the eagley gullet without touching the sides. No-one needed to take anyone on a [[change journey]]. The eaglery saw it, got it, and adopted it immediately.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}