Change journey: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Fat chance of that happening.
Fat chance of that happening.


Another way of looking at this: any technology that can’t accommodate how users currently behave — that oblige the user to accommodate the tech, and not vice versa, '' isn’t very good tech''. For [[legaltech]] is meant to be faster, cheaper and reliable than us. It is the unpaid, uncomplaining, eagle-eyed but fundamentally dull articled clerk, there to take the dross away and give us room to work the ineffable magic of which only the higher cortical functions of ''homo sapiens sapiens'' is capable.
Instead — the decision having been taken to implement a new matter management system — a slew of graduates from the COO function will be co-opted to take the department on a “change journey” from their sub-optimal, antediluvian ways, to an enlightened state somehow closer to the [[singularity]] which will result from diligent use of this new system.
 
This is, naturally, to misunderstand lawyers as egregiously as it is possible to do. Lawyers, being engaged in the process of answering a calling — however dimly they may be aware of what that calling may be —  are already ''on'' a journey. It is tedious enough as it is — they only found this out for certain once well past the point of any practical return — so any further diversion is to be sorely regretted. Especially one prompted by some little twerps in the COO function.
 
Lawyers are, like most professionals, creatures of ingrained ''habit''. The exercise of bidding them stop doing ''this'' and starting to do ''that'' is no simple matter of presenting a curt intellectual argument that can be summarised on PowerPoint and delivered ''en masse'' by the contractor brought in to be “change programme workstream lead”. It is, rather, an intense, multi-year, exercise in artful, sympathetic, psychological reprogramming. Even if handled masterfully, it carries no more than an even chance of success.
 
Another way of looking at this is that: any technology that can’t accommodate how users ''currently'' behave — that obliges the user to accommodate the application, and not vice versa, ''isn’t very good tech''. For [[legaltech]] is meant to be faster, cheaper and reliable than us. It is the underpaid, uncomplaining, eagle-eyed but fundamentally dull articled clerk, there to take the dross away and give the subject matter expert wings to work her ineffable magic.


{{Sa}}
{{Sa}}
*[[Change management]]
*[[Change management]]