Change management: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "{{a|devil|}}{{d|Change management|/ʧeɪnʤ ˈmænɪʤmənt /|n|}} The business of tinkering with the workings of an organisation that generally would be better left to organ...")
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|}}{{d|Change management|/ʧeɪnʤ ˈmænɪʤmənt /|n|}}
{{a|hr|}}{{d|Change management|/ʧeɪnʤ ˈmænɪʤmənt /|n|}}


The business of tinkering with the workings of an organisation that generally would be better left to organise itself.
The business of tinkering with the workings of an organisation that generally would be better left to organise itself.


[[Thought leader]]s like to agonise on [[LinkedIn]] about good ways to communicate and consult on [[change]]. It goes without saying one must announce, consult, conduct Q&A, reassure, give reasoning and generally support ones chicklings throughout the [[change journey]].
[[Thought leader]]s like to agonise on [[LinkedIn]] about good ways to communicate and [[consultation|consult]] on [[change]]. It goes without saying one must announce, consult, conduct Q&A, reassure, give reasoning and generally support ones chicklings throughout the [[change journey]].


Now you either subscribe to a monarchic model where you are a golden source of inspiration surrounded by the silver and bronze officeholders of executive management, beyond whose gilded perimeters lies a sea of functionary dullitude — in which case what on earth are you asking ''them'' for — or you see your organisation as a network of autonomous experts, continually reacting to the market as they perceive it, and which your job is merely to coordinate — in which case what are you doing trying to change things at all?
Now you either subscribe to a monarchic model where you are a golden source of inspiration surrounded by the silver and bronze officeholders of executive management, beyond whose gilded perimeters lies a sea of functionary dullitude — in which case what on earth are you asking ''them'' for — or you see your organisation as a network of autonomous experts, continually reacting to the market as they perceive it, and which your job is merely to coordinate — in which case what are you doing trying to change things at all?
Line 14: Line 14:


And there is a wider point, too: change should be a gradual affair, allowing the organisation by degrees to to shapeshift into a more suitable direction. By keeping the plan quiet and and making the changes gradually and over an extended period it is more likely that they will work. A preannounced, sudden, 20-degree change in direction, even if, and and indeed especially if, foreshadowed by 6-months of consultation, almost certainly won’t.
And there is a wider point, too: change should be a gradual affair, allowing the organisation by degrees to to shapeshift into a more suitable direction. By keeping the plan quiet and and making the changes gradually and over an extended period it is more likely that they will work. A preannounced, sudden, 20-degree change in direction, even if, and and indeed especially if, foreshadowed by 6-months of consultation, almost certainly won’t.
{{sa}}
*[[Consultation]]
*[[Thought leader]]
*[[Change journey]]
*[[Iteration]]