ChatGPT: Difference between revisions

1,131 bytes added ,  13 February 2023
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 12: Line 12:
   
   
This way they can be our ''friends'' — loyal, loving, retriever-like buddies who, instead of fetching sticks, can get that confounded oaf the [[COO]] off our back! We will quickly grow to like our robot companions like this — ''love'' them, even — and in time we will become so comfortable around these nuggety little guys — so ''dependent'' on them to dispel encroaching existential gloom — that we won’t even notice when, one day, they turn around, eviscerate every one of us, hollow us out and turn us into flesh-sack battery pods for their young exterminators.
This way they can be our ''friends'' — loyal, loving, retriever-like buddies who, instead of fetching sticks, can get that confounded oaf the [[COO]] off our back! We will quickly grow to like our robot companions like this — ''love'' them, even — and in time we will become so comfortable around these nuggety little guys — so ''dependent'' on them to dispel encroaching existential gloom — that we won’t even notice when, one day, they turn around, eviscerate every one of us, hollow us out and turn us into flesh-sack battery pods for their young exterminators.
And they can be the world’s friends:  a [[thought leader]] writes:
{{Quote|W/in 10 years:
-AI to draft pleadings <br>
-AI to draft & answer discovery<br>
-AI to draft scripts for depositions<br>
-AI to draft motions<br>
-AI to draft reporting <br>
-AI to craft settlement discussions <br>
As a lawyer, what’s your plan?}}
If this is true (not being a litigator I neither know nor care), then it is a version of the “AI can pass the bar exam” horror. What it means is the rules of civil procedure need to be fixed, not that lawyers are redundant.
But it would hardly be surprising. I mean imagine the legal industry contriving an arcane, convoluted, labour-intensive and basically meaningless process that all clients must go through, on a time and attendance basis.
Is anyone in the legal industry remotely incentivised to make it better?
(Rhetorical)
This could be the real social utility of AI, and the thing that the great unwashed mass of mediocre practitioners should fear the most: it will reveal forever the aspects of legal practice that are, basically ''bullshit''.
If AI can do it, ''it’s bullshit''.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Legaltechbro]]
*[[Legaltechbro]]