Circle of delegation: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
How organisations work<br>
{{a|mgmt|}}The subtle art of [[delegation]], an essay on how [[big organisation]]s work: You have a simple but important question. Luckily, you know the firm has set up a [[cross-divisional]] working group - with multifarious [[workstream]]s — hundreds strong — of [[lawyer]]s, [[compliance professional]]s, [[operations]] staff, [[COO]]s and external [[management consultant]]s to consider this, and related issues, in minute detail.
[ONE]<br>
 
'''Me''':  Hi Mary. could I pick your brains today about fee rebates under Mifid 2?<br>
====''ROUND ONE''====
'''Mary''': Hi Olly, the best person for fees & charges Qs would be either Matthew (Regs Team) or Mark (Legal), since they've followed MIFID II for a lot longer. M<br>
''[[Jolly Contrarian|You]] chat '''Mary''', whom you know is fully involved in the [[MiFID 2]] [[inducements]] [[workstream]], not expecting your query to occupy most of the following 48 hours.'' <br>
[Matthew is out of the office. Let’s try Mark. TWO]<br>
 
'''Me''': Mark - Hi - I'm in IB legal - Mary gave me your name. i gather you're an expert on MiFID ii re fees and charges in AM?<br>
'''[[Jolly Contrarian|You]]''':  Hi Mary. could I pick your brains today about fee rebates under [[MiFID 2]]?<br>
'''Mark''': Costs and charges? I'm not the expert! This is under the Investor Protection part of the program. That is run by Luke. <br>
'''Mary''': Hi [[Jolly Contrarian|Frank]], the best person for fees & charges questions would be either Matthew (regulatory affairs) or Mark ([[legal]]), since they've followed [[MiFID 2]] for a lot longer than I have. [[Thx]] M<br>
[Luke is out of the office.]<br>
 
'''Me''': Great, thanks. Luke seems to be out of the office - does he have a deputy?<br>
''VOICEOVER: Matthew is out of the office. Let’s try Mark.'' <br>
'''Mark''': I think Joan is the business analyst on the costs and charges work-stream ... If she isn’t I think she'll point you in the right direction.<br>
 
[THREE]<br>
====''ROUND TWO''====
'''Me''': Hi Joan - Mark tells me you're the business analyst on the costs and charges work stream for MIFID 2? I'm really interested in getting the buy-side view of fee retrocessions and rebates in MIFID 2. Would you have a few minutes to discuss?<br>
'''[[Jolly Contrarian|You]]''': Mark - Hi - I'm in IB legal - Mary gave me your name. i gather you're an expert on [[MiFID 2]] re fees and charges?<br>
'''Joan''': Can we do on Friday next week? Can you give some more background on your question.<br>
'''Mark''': Costs and charges? That falls under the Investor Protection part of the program. That is run by Luke. <br>
'''Me''': Actually I was hoping to speak today. A 10 minute call - perhaps with someone in your team? - should help contextualise the question and may indeed answer it.<br>
 
'''Joan''': Sure. Speak to Andrea.<br>
''VOICEOVER: Luke is out of the office.''<br>
[FOUR]<br>
 
'''Me''': Andrea! Hi! we are investigating the MiFID 2 implications re inducements and conflicts of interest<br>
'''[[Jolly Contrarian|You]]''': Great, thanks. Luke seems to be out of the office - does he have a deputy?<br>
I am told by Joan that you're the subject matter expert on this! Would you have a moment to speak today?<br>
'''Mark''': Joan is the business analyst on the costs and charges [[work-stream]] ... If she isn’t the right person, she'll point you in the right direction.<br>
Andrea: Hi Olly - I look after the cost and charges disclosures under MiFID II. Anthony looks after inducements. If you are referring to conflict of interest under inducements Anthony would look after that.<br>
 
[FIVE]<br>
====''ROUND THREE''====
'''Me''': Anthony! Hi! we are investigating the MiFID 2 implications re inducements and conflicts of interest as we understand these are being considerably tightened up in practical guidance over the MiFID 1 regime notwithstanding the text being quite similar. Andrea tells me that you're the subject matter expert on this! Would you have a moment to speak today?<br>
'''[[Jolly Contrarian|You]]''': Joan! Hi! Mark tells me you're the business analyst on the costs and charges [[workstream]] for [[MiFID 2]]. I'm really interested in getting the buy-side view on fee sharing and rebates. Would you have a few minutes to discuss?<br>
'''Anthony''': Hi. We have broken the inducements workstream under MiFID 2 into two: non-monetary on one hand and monetary on the other. I look after non-monetary. Monetary is Thomas.<br>
'''Joan''': Can we do on Friday next week? Also, in advance of our call, can you give some more background on your question?<br>
[SIX]<br>
'''[[Jolly Contrarian|You]]''': Actually I was hoping to speak to someone today. A 10 minute call, tops - perhaps with someone in your team? - should help contextualise the question and may indeed answer it.<br>
'''Me''': Thomas! Hi! we are investigating the MiFID 2 implications re inducements and conflicts of interest as we understand these are being considerably tightened up in practical guidance over the MiFID 1 regime notwithstanding the text being quite similar. Thomas tells me that you're the subject matter expert on monetary inducements! Would you have a moment to speak today?<br>
'''Joan''': Sure. Speak to Andrea in Hong Kong.<br>
 
''VOICEOVER: Someone in Hong Kong is running a [[MiFID 2]] [[workstream]].''<br>
 
====''ROUND FOUR''====
'''[[Jolly Contrarian|You]]''': Andrea! Hi! we are investigating the [[MiFID 2]] implications re inducements and conflicts of interest.
Joan tells me you're the [[subject matter expert]] on this. Would you have a moment to speak today?<br>
'''Andrea''': Hi [[Jolly Contrarian|Frank]]. In fact, I look after the costs and charges ''disclosures'' under [[MiFID 2]]. Anthony looks after inducements arising from ''payment'' of costs and charges. If you are referring to conflict of interest under inducements Anthony would look after that. <br>
 
====''ROUND FIVE''====
'''[[Jolly Contrarian|You]]''': Anthony! Hi! we are investigating the [[MiFID 2]] implications re inducements and conflicts of interest as they relate to fee-sharing a arrangements. Andrea me that you're the subject matter expert on this! Would you have a moment to speak today?<br>
'''Anthony''': Hi. We have broken the [[MiFID 2]] inducements [[workstream]] into two: non-monetary and monetary. I look after non-monetary. Monetary is Thomas.<br>
 
====''ROUND SIX''====
'''[[Jolly Contrarian|You]]''': Thomas! Hi! we are investigating the [[MiFID 2]] implications re inducements and conflicts of interest as they relate to fee-sharing a arrangements. Anthony tells me that you're the [[subject matter expert]] on this! Would you have a moment to speak today?<br>
<br>
<br>
''Pause''<br>
'''Thomas''': have you tried Mary?<br>
'''Thomas''': have you tried Mary?<br>
<br>
<br>


''Voiceover: MARY IS THE PERSON HE STARTED WITH.''


{{seealso}}
{{sa}}
*[[Circle of escalation]]
*[[Circle of escalation]]
*[[Inverted delegation]]
*[[Inverted delegation]]
{{draft}}
{{draft}}
{{egg}}
{{egg}}
{{ref}}