Circle of escalation: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
:“''There may be an increased risk of retrospective [[withholding]] which is hard to quantify,''” she will say<ref>When one gives tax advice for a living one gets adept at saying this sort of thing by rote</ref> “''but as long as the desk is prepared to absorb that additional risk then I [[have no objections]] to this.''”
:“''There may be an increased risk of retrospective [[withholding]] which is hard to quantify,''” she will say<ref>When one gives tax advice for a living one gets adept at saying this sort of thing by rote</ref> “''but as long as the desk is prepared to absorb that additional risk then I [[have no objections]] to this.''”


And lo, off the escalation goes to the business. [[Salespeople]], naturally, have but one goal — impregnating their [[client]]s — while assuming no responsibility for the congress should it go wrong. So along the chain it goes, to the trader, a young whippersnapper who will neither know nor care what “absorbing additional tax risk” even is, and who certainly won’t want to be responsible for it. {{sex|He}} will pass it up his line management, a better coiffed version of his charge but with no more insight into tax risk, who will instinctively direct the query to {{sex|his}} [[chief operating officer]].
And lo, off the escalation goes to the business. [[Salespeople]], naturally, have but one goal — impregnating their [[client]]s — while assuming no responsibility for the congress should it go wrong. So along the chain it goes to the [[trader]], a young whippersnapper who will neither know nor care what “absorbing additional tax risk” even is, and who certainly won’t want to be responsible for it. {{sex|He}} will pass it up his line management, a better coiffed version of his charge but with no more insight into tax risk, who will instinctively direct the query to {{sex|his}} [[chief operating officer]], a chap who is nothing if not expert in retrospective withholding risk.<ref>{{swidt}}</ref>
 
[[COO]]s are nothing if not expert in retrospective withholding risk.


And so on.
And so on.


Eventually it will get to the level of exaltation in the firm wherein personnel known by all — not to their faces — by only familiar versions of their Christian names. [[Chuck]] will say, “In principle I [[would be]] [[inclined]] to be ok with this [[at this stage]], but can you just run this by [[Chip]] to make sure they have no issues.”
Eventually this query will get to a level of exaltation in the firm wherein personnel known by all — not to their faces, of course — by only familiar versions of their Christian names. [[Chuck]] will say, “In principle I [[would be]] [[inclined]] to be ok with this [[at this stage]], but can you just run this by [[Chip]] to make sure they have no issues.”


[[Chip]] is the [[general counsel]], a handsome silvered fifty five year-old with the bearing, and legal acumen, of a 747 pilot. You know exactly where he’s going to send it, don't you.
[[Chip]] is the [[general counsel]], a handsome silvered fifty five year-old with the bearing, and legal acumen, of a 747 pilot. You know exactly where he’s going to send it, don't you.
Line 25: Line 23:
And so the cycle of life turns fully and returns whence it came.
And so the cycle of life turns fully and returns whence it came.


{{limpcelery}}
{{limpcelery}}{{c|Metaphor}}
{{ref}}
{{ref}}
{{c|Metaphor}}