Clog on the equity of redemption: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{anat|security}}
{{anat|security|[[File:Clogs.jpg|frameless|left|450px|Clogs on the [[equity of redemption]] (obscured)]]}}
Giving the lie to the old saw that civil law tradition favoured by our continental cousins isn’t clever enough to separate legal and beneficial interests comes this proof that a fundament of the law of equity has its origins in Netherlands.  For, otherwise, they would be ''sneakers'' on the [[equity of redemption]], wouldn't they.
Giving the lie to the old saw that civil law tradition favoured by our continental cousins isn’t clever enough to separate legal and beneficial interests comes this proof that a fundament of the law of equity has its origins in Netherlands.  For, otherwise, they would be ''sneakers'' on the [[equity of redemption]], wouldn't they.
[[File:Clogs.jpg|thumb|left|450px|Clogs on the [[equity of redemption]] (obscured)]]
 
{{egg}}
{{egg}}