Clog on the equity of redemption: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|security|{{image|Clogs|jpg|Clogs on the [[equity of redemption]] (obscured)}}}}
{{a|security|{{image|Clogs|jpg|Clogs on the [[equity of redemption]] (obscured)}}}}Giving the lie to the old saw that civil law tradition favoured by our continental cousins isn’t clever enough to separate legal and beneficial interests comes this proof that a fundament of the law of equity has its origins in Netherlands.  For, otherwise, they would be ''sneakers'' on the [[equity of redemption]], wouldn’t they.
Giving the lie to the old saw that civil law tradition favoured by our continental cousins isn’t clever enough to separate legal and beneficial interests comes this proof that a fundament of the law of equity has its origins in Netherlands.  For, otherwise, they would be ''sneakers'' on the [[equity of redemption]], wouldn’t they.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Trust]]
*[[Trust]]
{{c|Trusts}}